In 1999 Dr. Dogan Turan founded Deniz Private Medical Center and Deniz Hair Transplant Center in Izmir and worked there as a medical aesthetician until 2006. He has performed more than 3,500 hair transplants on patients from all over the world since 1999. From 2001 to 2005, he worked as a chief surgeon in the General Directorate of the Border and Coastal Health Service of Turkey of the Ministry of Health of Turkey. In 2005, he also established the Karşıyaka Çesav Medical Center in Izmir. In 2012, Dr. Turan took his experience to Istanbul and continued his work in the world of hair transplantation as a General Surgeon, Medical Aesthetician and General Manager. Recently, he became a member of the World FUE Institute.
FUE
2,500 $
Procedure
Pros and Cons
Duration & Aftercare
Profile based on user information and experiences. Request changes
The surgery went well and I’m excited to see the results. The surgeon really took all my expectations into consideration. The hairline looks really close to what I hoped for.
The surgery went well and I’m excited to see the results. The surgeon really took all my expectations into consideration. The hairline looks really close to what I hoped for.
I want to share my experience of my FUE treatment for anyone who’s uncertain whether they should get a hair transplant. The procedure was quite scary to me, but the friendly staff and experienced doctor helped me through it really well. I’m surprised with the results so far. The doctor took 3200 grafts of the back of my head and I feel like this was enough to get back a good density.
I want to share my experience of my FUE treatment for anyone who’s uncertain whether they should get a hair transplant. The procedure was quite scary to me, but the friendly staff and experienced doctor helped me through it really well. I’m surprised with the results so far. The doctor took 3200 grafts of the back of my head and I feel like this was enough to get back a good density.
I was advised to get a a small hair transplant. I’m glad that Dogan shared this knowledge with me and really wants what’s best for me, not only for this clinic.
I was advised to get a a small hair transplant. I’m glad that Dogan shared this knowledge with me and really wants what’s best for me, not only for this clinic.
I am extremely happy with the consultation that I had with this hair clinic. We went through all the critical points like the quantity of grafts and the method that would fit best. He’s very sincere and is an incredibly careful listener. Highly recommend! 10/10.
I am extremely happy with the consultation that I had with this hair clinic. We went through all the critical points like the quantity of grafts and the method that would fit best. He’s very sincere and is an incredibly careful listener. Highly recommend! 10/10.
My initial experience with the clinic for my hair transplant was positive. The consultation, the surgery itself, and the arrangements for local transport and accommodation were handled professionally. The immediate aftercare was also satisfactory in the first weeks following the procedure.
Issues with Final Result:
The long-term results of the hair transplant have been disappointing. It has become clear that the density of the transplanted hair is not sufficient, and critically, a significant number of hairs were implanted at an incorrect angle and/or direction, leading to an unnatural appearance.
Post-Result Communication & Resolution Offer:
Once I raised these concerns regarding the disappointing result—specifically the low density and incorrect hair growth direction—the clinic’s communication became very difficult. Contact was severely delayed, and I had to follow up repeatedly.
After much persistence, I was eventually offered a second procedure to address the density issue, but at a cost of €600. I do not consider this a fair resolution. A second surgery is a significant commitment, involving another uncomfortable procedure and a long recovery/aftercare period. Furthermore, this second procedure, as offered, would not resolve the issue of the incorrect hair direction, which is a key part of the poor result.
Finally, I believe that having to pay an additional fee to correct an unsatisfactory initial outcome is inappropriate. I requested an alternative solution or a full, comprehensive plan to correct the issues, including the poor direction/angle of growth, but unfortunately, I have received no further response or offer of an acceptable alternative.
Conclusion:
While the process of the consultation and surgery was initially smooth, the overall value and professional standard of care are severely undermined by the unsatisfactory final aesthetic result and the subsequent extremely difficult, unhelpful, and unprofessional communication from the clinic when attempting to seek a fair correction. Potential patients should consider the possibility of being left with a poor outcome and little to no reasonable recourse or support.
My initial experience with the clinic for my hair transplant was positive. The consultation, the surgery itself, and the arrangements for local transport and accommodation were handled professionally. The immediate aftercare was also satisfactory in the first weeks following the procedure.
Issues with Final Result:
The long-term results of the hair transplant have been disappointing. It has become clear that the density of the transplanted hair is not sufficient, and critically, a significant number of hairs were implanted at an incorrect angle and/or direction, leading to an unnatural appearance.
Post-Result Communication & Resolution Offer:
Once I raised these concerns regarding the disappointing result—specifically the low density and incorrect hair growth direction—the clinic’s communication became very difficult. Contact was severely delayed, and I had to follow up repeatedly.
After much persistence, I was eventually offered a second procedure to address the density issue, but at a cost of €600. I do not consider this a fair resolution. A second surgery is a significant commitment, involving another uncomfortable procedure and a long recovery/aftercare period. Furthermore, this second procedure, as offered, would not resolve the issue of the incorrect hair direction, which is a key part of the poor result.
Finally, I believe that having to pay an additional fee to correct an unsatisfactory initial outcome is inappropriate. I requested an alternative solution or a full, comprehensive plan to correct the issues, including the poor direction/angle of growth, but unfortunately, I have received no further response or offer of an acceptable alternative.
Conclusion:
While the process of the consultation and surgery was initially smooth, the overall value and professional standard of care are severely undermined by the unsatisfactory final aesthetic result and the subsequent extremely difficult, unhelpful, and unprofessional communication from the clinic when attempting to seek a fair correction. Potential patients should consider the possibility of being left with a poor outcome and little to no reasonable recourse or support.
